- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 364
- Points
- 103
Just get off the phone with PetPlan USA and extremely upset -- not only was our claims denied and Kika's HCM was written under "pre-existing condition" -- I also feel they done so wrongly just not to pay and is very upset.
We got Yorik end of January and having 2 kittens in the house I finally gave up and decided to protect myself with pet insurance. After many board readings and plan comparison I decided on PetPlan USA and got policy for both of them which went in effect on 2/9..
on 2/16 we had regular first check up with Yorik at the vet and mentioned to the vet that Kika is (still) coughing -- he suggested to do x-rays and put it in the medical history.
on 2/23 we took Kika for x-rays and that where we learn that her heart is enlarged and were advised to to cardio sonogram.
on 2/28 we did sonogram and learned about her HCM condition. While we were discussing the condition and meds, cardiologist specifically told us that for felines -- cough is never related to HCM and we should do some other tests to figure out the source of coughing..
---------------------
According to PetPlan rules our policy went in effect 14 days latter.. which is exactly on 23rd. However we are denied claim on the grounds that she was coughing on 2/16 and coughing is sign of HCM and since than HCM is pre-existing and not being covered anymore.
I am not sure if I should call cardiologist and try to get a letter from him specifying that cough in felines is not related and is not a sign of HCM? Or should I just forget and send email cancellation of policy to them as I feel already cheated and better just opening bank account for Kika's medical bills and put money aside..
What do you think? Fortunately never before I had to deal with insurance and right now feel very cheated and upset.
Also -- I do not have anything written from them -- not in the email or snail mail. I called today finally to find out why I am not getting anything and that how I learned about their decision.
They promised me email right away -- about an hour ago and nothing has arrived - I guess they do not want to put it in writing now?
We got Yorik end of January and having 2 kittens in the house I finally gave up and decided to protect myself with pet insurance. After many board readings and plan comparison I decided on PetPlan USA and got policy for both of them which went in effect on 2/9..
on 2/16 we had regular first check up with Yorik at the vet and mentioned to the vet that Kika is (still) coughing -- he suggested to do x-rays and put it in the medical history.
on 2/23 we took Kika for x-rays and that where we learn that her heart is enlarged and were advised to to cardio sonogram.
on 2/28 we did sonogram and learned about her HCM condition. While we were discussing the condition and meds, cardiologist specifically told us that for felines -- cough is never related to HCM and we should do some other tests to figure out the source of coughing..
---------------------
According to PetPlan rules our policy went in effect 14 days latter.. which is exactly on 23rd. However we are denied claim on the grounds that she was coughing on 2/16 and coughing is sign of HCM and since than HCM is pre-existing and not being covered anymore.
I am not sure if I should call cardiologist and try to get a letter from him specifying that cough in felines is not related and is not a sign of HCM? Or should I just forget and send email cancellation of policy to them as I feel already cheated and better just opening bank account for Kika's medical bills and put money aside..
What do you think? Fortunately never before I had to deal with insurance and right now feel very cheated and upset.
Also -- I do not have anything written from them -- not in the email or snail mail. I called today finally to find out why I am not getting anything and that how I learned about their decision.
They promised me email right away -- about an hour ago and nothing has arrived - I guess they do not want to put it in writing now?

. I have Trupanion and they initially declined to cover Finn's echo cardiogram too because it was noted in his chart that during his first vet visit at three months old that my vet "possibly heard a grade 1 heart murmur but could not reproduce." Trupanion said that they were treating this as a preexisting condition because a murmur is a symptom of HCM. No murmur was ever heard at any of Finn's subsequent visits, so my vet wrote a letter of dispute. Finn's internist also wrote a letter of appeal because the echocardiogram was ordered because Finn's heart appeared enlarged on an xray, not because of a murmur. Even though the cardiologist heard a slight murmur, he noted in his report that it was benign and unrelated to the mild HCM symptoms he had found, so that report was submitted too. After all this was sent to Trupanion, they did reverse their decision and have since reimbursed me for the echo. It was a giant pain though and I was beside myself when they first refused to cover it since he will be needing follow-up echos in the future. I guess all of this was really just a long way of saying that I've been where you were too, so I know exactly how you were feeling.